Body consciousness: stereotypes ‘still hold back female scholars’

Researcher says it is difficult to find portrayals of female scientists that focus on achievement

Published on
March 25, 2018
Last updated
March 26, 2018
Sofia Kovalevskaya
Source: Getty

Stereotypes about attractiveness and androgyny still hold back the progress of women in the sciences and mathematics, a scholar has argued.

Eva?Maria Kaufholz, a PhD student at Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, has traced these stereotypes back to literature on the?Russian mathematician Sofia Kovalevskaya (1850-91), the first woman?to obtain a full professorship in Northern Europe.

Early biographers claimed that Kovalevskaya’s achievements were partly spurred on by her jealousy of a more attractive sister or that her allegedly androgynous looks reflected the fact that, by excelling in mathematics, she had broken down a “natural barrier” between the sexes.

Later writers, keen to present her as a role model, assured their readers that the professor at what is now Stockholm University was “the full package” and “the best-looking mathematician of either sex”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Ms Kaufholz said that similar stereotypes can still be found. Examples were pink “I’m too pretty to do maths” T-shirts and the online comments when the late Maryam Mirzakhani became the first woman to win the Fields Medal in 2014 (“Congrats! She’s very beautiful” and “That’s a female? She has more testosterone than I do”). Equally pernicious was the continuing “gender bias in the attribution of creativity”, based on the age-old assumption that women can be competent scientists but never truly creative.

The stress on looks and androgyny, however, had also led to what Ms Kaufholz described as “a counter-movement assuring us that even female mathematicians and scientists can be sexy”. She cited Marie No?lle’s 2016 film?Marie Curie: The Courage of Knowledge,?in which the Nobel prizewinner – described by one reviewer as “so hot, she’s radioactive” – devotes most of her time and energy to a passionate affair with a married man.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although Ms Kaufholz acknowledged that such portrayals “have feminist interests at heart and want to show that you don’t have to be ugly to be a mathematician”, she was opposed to their continuing stress on “body consciousness” rather than achievement. Presenting her research at Imperial College London earlier this month, she ended her talk with a montage of photographs showing colleagues of many different shapes and sizes in order to demonstrate that “being a female mathematician is not connected with the way you look or present yourself”.

“You wouldn’t have a movie where Albert Einstein is chopping wood so we are sure he’s a man,” Ms Kaufholz pointed out. “Nobody has ever considered that to be necessary. But we need to assure viewer that [female scientists] are women. And that can only done in a sexual way.”

matthew.reisz@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT