‘Student-led’ AHRC PhD places ‘to fall by at least 60 per cent’

Internal modelling released under Freedom of Information enquiry reveals extent of PhD scholarship cuts, with academics fearing impact could be greater still

July 21, 2025
Student studying on laptop in library
Source: iStock/Ivan Kyryk

The number of student-initiated PhD scholarships funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) is set to fall by 60 per cent?when new doctoral training arrangements come into effect next year, new figures show.

Plans to drastically reduce the number of funded doctoral places have faced fierce criticism since they were?unveiled?almost two years ago, with the AHRC stating at the time that they will support just 300 scholarships a year by 2029-30, down from 425, a 29 per cent drop.

There are, however, concerns that the overall reduction in funded places masks a greater decline in the number of awards for PhDs whose topics are suggested by students and which have been overseen by universities attached to doctoral training partnerships (DTPs).

Under the new model, the AHRC will instead?grant 150 “landscape awards” to 50 universities each year – three per institution annually – with the names of those institutions chosen?

ADVERTISEMENT

While several academics have claimed these new arrangements will?represent a significant cut?in available places, the extent has not been made public – partly because each of the 10 AHRC DTPs operate autonomously, with affiliated institutions match funding PhD scholarships under their funding obligations.

Internal modelling requested by?Times Higher Education?under the Freedom of Information Act, however, has revealed that the cut in numbers is likely to be substantial. Excluding institutional co-funding, the number of AHRC-funded PhD students funded under the DTP/landscape route will fall from 372 in 2024-25 to 150 in 2026-27, a 60 per cent cut, the research council says.

ADVERTISEMENT

The funding scenario for students may, however, be even bleaker when the requirement for institutions to match fund scholarships disappears with the start of landscape awards next year, the figures suggest.

A total of 584 students were recruited across 10 AHRC DTPs in 2024-25 once co-funded students were considered, modelling shows. To sustain the same level of studentships, funded institutions would need to match fund roughly three PhDs for every doctoral landscape award they received.

“The projected 60 per cent decrease almost certainly masks even greater cuts since the previous DTP contracts tied institutions into match funding arrangements,” said Andrew McRae, professor of Renaissance studies at the University of Exeter, where he was formerly the head of its doctoral college.

“These were set at stretching rates, in a different economic climate, with the aim of winning DTP awards. I’d expect many universities to back away from these now that they can,” he added.

ADVERTISEMENT

Under the new AHRC PhD training model, “centres of doctoral training” (CDTs), whose final cohort was recruited in 2018-19, will be revived in the form of 50 “focal awards” a year centred on two themes – the creative economy or “a healthy planet, people, and place”. University consortia leads on these awards were?named?earlier this month.

The internal modelling confirms that the number of students pursuing a PhD through “collaborative doctoral provision”, working with museums, libraries and other non-university partners, will remain constant at 50 per year between 2024-25 and 2026-27.

In addition, the AHRC will fund 30 PhDs a year on thematic cross-research council projects, the figures also confirm.

However, the “stretch to core, discipline-sustaining provision was certainly concerning”, said McRae.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s almost as though the AHRC is betting on a sustained contraction in the system, and hence less need for potential lecturers five years down the track. They might well be right,” he said.

An AHRC spokesperson said: “The changes to AHRC's doctoral funding are designed to ensure we have a balanced, sustainable portfolio, allowing us to target our limited funds at the areas of greatest need.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Our approach is in line with our ambition to create a research and innovation system which is open and accessible to wide-ranging talent, and to take a strategic approach to addressing challenges through the support we provide,” they added.

jack.grove@timeshighereducation.com

Register to continue

Why register?

  • Registration is free and only takes a moment
  • Once registered, you can read 3 articles a month
  • Sign up for our newsletter
Please
or
to read this article.

Related articles

Reader's comments (7)

"Just 300 scholarships a year by 2029-30, down from 425, a 29 per cent drop." This is bad news but I think tbh that there simply are not and will not be jobs for these people in the Arts and Humanities. Will there be c 300 new posts each year tho absorb these people, and what about the 100s who are still looking for permanent posts? Maybe it's for the best in the long run that people don't embark on these PhD projects only to find there's nothing for them in 3 or 4 years and they have lost some of their best years. Not the kind of thing I like to say or that I expect anyone likes to read.
Sadly I agree. I don't encourage anyone to go into doctoral study in there Arts and Humanities anymore who wishes to pursue an academic career.
"a greater decline in the number of awards for PhDs whose topics are suggested by students and which have been overseen by universities attached to doctoral training partnerships". This is also significant of course. I have worried in the past about some of the often niche projects students wish to undertake at PhD level and wondered how they would fare on the job market in years to come. But it does look as if the sector is down-sizing and that this is especially the case in the Arts and Humanties, so there's no point producing highly qualified specialist PhDs where there will be no opportunities. Will there be any ring-fencing of endangered subjects such as languages, medieval studies, classics etc?
Ring fencing medieval studies? I’d like to think so, but I doubt it. This sounds like a deliberate running down of those subjects. Fewer PhDs means fewer future academics. That will make it easier for managers to merge or close those departments in future.
“It’s almost as though the AHRC is betting on a sustained contraction in the system, and hence less need for potential lecturers five years down the track. They might well be right,” he said. Pretty safe bet if you ask me. I imagine they also have pretty strong "inside information" and this is not just a punt as it were?
But what about the students just completing their PhDs in Arts and Humanities subjects? What happens to them? Does anyone care about them? Should they be advised to finish off and change career? Are there any support mechanisms in place for them or is it just everyone for themselves?
new
‘On yer bike’ will probably be the message.

Sponsored

Featured jobs

See all jobs
ADVERTISEMENT